<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Industry Figure Tom Chappell</title>
	<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog</link>
	<description>Yet Another Media Spotlight</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hilarious / Terrifying Graph of Lending from Federal Reserve To Banks by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/hilariousterrifying-graph-of-lending-from-federal-reserve-to-banks.html#comment-1214</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/hilariousterrifying-graph-of-lending-from-federal-reserve-to-banks.html#comment-1214</guid>
					<description>Crap, the vertical line on the Hilarious / Terrifying Graph is more than 4 times larger than when I first posted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crap, the vertical line on the Hilarious / Terrifying Graph is more than 4 times larger than when I first posted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sarah Palin Fail&#8230;Futures Market! by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/sarah-palin-futures-market.html#comment-1213</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/sarah-palin-futures-market.html#comment-1213</guid>
					<description>Aw, I should have checked to see what the prices were like in the last week, but I forgot. Dang!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, I should have checked to see what the prices were like in the last week, but I forgot. Dang!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should you buy a home&#8230;now? by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/should-you-buy-a-housenow.html#comment-1121</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/should-you-buy-a-housenow.html#comment-1121</guid>
					<description>November 1, 2008: $394,000, an actual (estimated) &lt;em&gt;rise&lt;/em&gt; of $1,000 so far this month. 

I will &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; believe that this is the bottom -- not even close.  We've got at least another 10% to go, from this point, probably more like 20% or 25%.

In other news, I see that &lt;em&gt;Zillow&lt;/em&gt; has announced plans to &lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2008/10/layoffs-at-redf.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;slash its workforce by 25%&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>November 1, 2008: $394,000, an actual (estimated) <em>rise</em> of $1,000 so far this month. </p>
<p>I will <em>never</em> believe that this is the bottom &#8212; not even close.  We&#8217;ve got at least another 10% to go, from this point, probably more like 20% or 25%.</p>
<p>In other news, I see that <em>Zillow</em> has announced plans to <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2008/10/layoffs-at-redf.html" rel="nofollow">slash its workforce by 25%</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tilted Twister: A LEGO Rubik&#8217;s Cube Solver by Jeff Lorenzini</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/10/tilted-twister-a-lego-rubiks-cube-solver.html#comment-1119</link>
		<author>Jeff Lorenzini</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/10/tilted-twister-a-lego-rubiks-cube-solver.html#comment-1119</guid>
					<description>Dude, that is the coolest thing I've ever seen. Right on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, that is the coolest thing I&#8217;ve ever seen. Right on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Frightening Show About the Economy by Stephen</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/10/this-american-life-another-frightening-show-about-the-economy.html#comment-1109</link>
		<author>Stephen</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/10/this-american-life-another-frightening-show-about-the-economy.html#comment-1109</guid>
					<description>Leah and I happened to hear this in the car yesterday morning.  As usual, the show is top-notch.  It was the best explanation of credit default swaps I've heard.  To me, the most startling line was the one you quoted about the $60T riding on $5T of bonds.  Huh?   Bad craziness ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leah and I happened to hear this in the car yesterday morning.  As usual, the show is top-notch.  It was the best explanation of credit default swaps I&#8217;ve heard.  To me, the most startling line was the one you quoted about the $60T riding on $5T of bonds.  Huh?   Bad craziness ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skeptics Caucus! Congressman Brad Sherman! by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/skeptics-caucus-congressman-brad-sherman.html#comment-1108</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 07:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/skeptics-caucus-congressman-brad-sherman.html#comment-1108</guid>
					<description>Well, *my* Representative listened; he not only voted against the big stupid bailout (twice), but led the charge against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, *my* Representative listened; he not only voted against the big stupid bailout (twice), but led the charge against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skeptics Caucus! Congressman Brad Sherman! by Bill Standley</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/skeptics-caucus-congressman-brad-sherman.html#comment-1106</link>
		<author>Bill Standley</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/skeptics-caucus-congressman-brad-sherman.html#comment-1106</guid>
					<description>Your reps sure listened, didn't they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your reps sure listened, didn&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should you buy a home&#8230;now? by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/should-you-buy-a-housenow.html#comment-1083</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/should-you-buy-a-housenow.html#comment-1083</guid>
					<description>October 1, 2008: $393,000.  

That's a drop of $21,000, 5% or so, in about two months, and $13,000 over the last month. No bottom yet!

Ooh, and on September 23, &lt;a href="http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/california-housing-report-still-going-down-in-flames-median-price-for-the-state-301000-37988-homes-sold-in-august-101724-distressed-foreclosure-filings-you-do-the-math/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dr. Housing Bubble&lt;/a&gt; reported that DataQuick had the median California Housing price at $301K; that's actually lower than my $303K call, so I guess the housing fiasco is over!  Good news!  

Oh, wait...my $303K call was for &lt;em&gt;Southern&lt;/em&gt; California prices.  Carry on falling, then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>October 1, 2008: $393,000.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a drop of $21,000, 5% or so, in about two months, and $13,000 over the last month. No bottom yet!</p>
<p>Ooh, and on September 23, <a href="http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/california-housing-report-still-going-down-in-flames-median-price-for-the-state-301000-37988-homes-sold-in-august-101724-distressed-foreclosure-filings-you-do-the-math/" rel="nofollow">Dr. Housing Bubble</a> reported that DataQuick had the median California Housing price at $301K; that&#8217;s actually lower than my $303K call, so I guess the housing fiasco is over!  Good news!  </p>
<p>Oh, wait&#8230;my $303K call was for <em>Southern</em> California prices.  Carry on falling, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skeptics Caucus! Congressman Brad Sherman! by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/skeptics-caucus-congressman-brad-sherman.html#comment-1102</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/skeptics-caucus-congressman-brad-sherman.html#comment-1102</guid>
					<description>The letter that Representative Sherman sent out to organize the Skeptics Caucus is &lt;a href="http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=8408" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The letter that Representative Sherman sent out to organize the Skeptics Caucus is <a href="http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=8408" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skeptics Caucus! Congressman Brad Sherman! by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/skeptics-caucus-congressman-brad-sherman.html#comment-1095</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/skeptics-caucus-congressman-brad-sherman.html#comment-1095</guid>
					<description>Oh, I phoned the DC office of this self-same Representative Brad Sherman last Monday.  The fellow who answered the phone said that Congressman Sherman was a little disturbed that he was being offered this bill, "Take it or leave it."

"Leave it."  My (emphatic) reply.

But how nice, and unexpected, to see them actually listening!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I phoned the DC office of this self-same Representative Brad Sherman last Monday.  The fellow who answered the phone said that Congressman Sherman was a little disturbed that he was being offered this bill, &#8220;Take it or leave it.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Leave it.&#8221;  My (emphatic) reply.</p>
<p>But how nice, and unexpected, to see them actually listening!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skeptics Caucus! Congressman Brad Sherman! by John Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/skeptics-caucus-congressman-brad-sherman.html#comment-1094</link>
		<author>John Blackburn</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/skeptics-caucus-congressman-brad-sherman.html#comment-1094</guid>
					<description>I know I phoned the office of *my* congressman and said, "No!  A thousand times. No!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I phoned the office of *my* congressman and said, &#8220;No!  A thousand times. No!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mortgages are less than half the problem by Jeff Lorenzini</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/mortgages-are-less-than-half-the-problem.html#comment-1092</link>
		<author>Jeff Lorenzini</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/mortgages-are-less-than-half-the-problem.html#comment-1092</guid>
					<description>The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) projects the 2009 federal deficit 
will rise to $482 billion. But adding the cost of announced and proposed bailouts, 
now approximately $1 trillion, it is undeniable that the federal deficit could double 
or triple in a short period of time, driving interest rates sharply higher and 
aggravating the very debt crisis that the bailout plan seeks to alleviate.   

We're fucked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) projects the 2009 federal deficit<br />
will rise to $482 billion. But adding the cost of announced and proposed bailouts,<br />
now approximately $1 trillion, it is undeniable that the federal deficit could double<br />
or triple in a short period of time, driving interest rates sharply higher and<br />
aggravating the very debt crisis that the bailout plan seeks to alleviate.   </p>
<p>We&#8217;re fucked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Horrifying Ramifications of Proposed Bailout Bill by Bill Standley</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/horrifying-ramifications-of-proposed-bailout-bill.html#comment-1078</link>
		<author>Bill Standley</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/horrifying-ramifications-of-proposed-bailout-bill.html#comment-1078</guid>
					<description>Oh yeah, "Happy Equinox!" -- if it's not too late!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, &#8220;Happy Equinox!&#8221; &#8212; if it&#8217;s not too late!  <img src='http://tomchappell.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Horrifying Ramifications of Proposed Bailout Bill by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/horrifying-ramifications-of-proposed-bailout-bill.html#comment-1075</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 06:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/horrifying-ramifications-of-proposed-bailout-bill.html#comment-1075</guid>
					<description>The whole world economy &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_the_shark" rel="nofollow"&gt;jumped the shark&lt;/a&gt; [of which, by the way, see &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_McGinley" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ted McGinley&lt;/a&gt;, the patron saint of shark-jumping] when mainstream countries such as England, the United States, the Netherlands and Australia (vs. e.g. Pakistan) decided that it would be a fun (and totally-legitimate) idea to &lt;a href="http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/09/australia-bans-short-selling.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;ban short selling&lt;/a&gt; equities.

Oh, and you didn't say, "Happy Equinox!"  Shame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole world economy <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_the_shark" rel="nofollow">jumped the shark</a> [of which, by the way, see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_McGinley" rel="nofollow">Ted McGinley</a>, the patron saint of shark-jumping] when mainstream countries such as England, the United States, the Netherlands and Australia (vs. e.g. Pakistan) decided that it would be a fun (and totally-legitimate) idea to <a href="http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/09/australia-bans-short-selling.html" rel="nofollow">ban short selling</a> equities.</p>
<p>Oh, and you didn&#8217;t say, &#8220;Happy Equinox!&#8221;  Shame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Horrifying Ramifications of Proposed Bailout Bill by Bill Standley</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/horrifying-ramifications-of-proposed-bailout-bill.html#comment-1074</link>
		<author>Bill Standley</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 05:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/horrifying-ramifications-of-proposed-bailout-bill.html#comment-1074</guid>
					<description>It's like watching a slow-motion train wreck.

The US government officially went bankrupt on August 15, 1971, when Nixon, at the behest of the finance kingpins of his day, broke the Bretton Woods agreement, and from that day forward, foreign central banks could no longer redeem their dollars for gold. It took 59 years for the deadly combination of politics and central bank alchemy to break the dollar. It took another 37 years to get to the "end game" that we're finally starting to witness.

Any steps taken to prevent liquidation of insolvent firms will... a) postpone -- not eliminate -- the liquidation; b) greatly increase the degree of moral hazard, and therefore future systemic risk.

What we have here is the Perfect Storm brewing. Just as expenditures for Medicare and Social Security ramp up for millions of boomers going on the dole, revenues from a debt-crippled service economy taper off. What happens when government revenues can no longer pay the interest on the national debt? What happens if foreigners turn up their noses at Treasury auctions? Worse, what if foreigners race to unload their dollar debt holdings? What could possibly close our trade deficit at that point?

I don't see any way out of this except through hyperinflation -- the full-on, Weimar-style variety. It's coming. I don't know when. But it's clearly inevitable. And it will be terrifying in certain geographic regions.

Think of America as tomorrow's Zimbabwe, but on a much larger scale. Add to this our ready-to-go concentration camps, our paramilitarized state and local police, and our government's new freedom to spy, command and control, and you've got the USSA -- the United Socialist States of Amerikka.

The pisser is that it was all avoidable.

It's a shame that most Americans don't have even a modicum of interest or knowledge in economics or history. They're about to learn the hard way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like watching a slow-motion train wreck.</p>
<p>The US government officially went bankrupt on August 15, 1971, when Nixon, at the behest of the finance kingpins of his day, broke the Bretton Woods agreement, and from that day forward, foreign central banks could no longer redeem their dollars for gold. It took 59 years for the deadly combination of politics and central bank alchemy to break the dollar. It took another 37 years to get to the &#8220;end game&#8221; that we&#8217;re finally starting to witness.</p>
<p>Any steps taken to prevent liquidation of insolvent firms will&#8230; a) postpone &#8212; not eliminate &#8212; the liquidation; b) greatly increase the degree of moral hazard, and therefore future systemic risk.</p>
<p>What we have here is the Perfect Storm brewing. Just as expenditures for Medicare and Social Security ramp up for millions of boomers going on the dole, revenues from a debt-crippled service economy taper off. What happens when government revenues can no longer pay the interest on the national debt? What happens if foreigners turn up their noses at Treasury auctions? Worse, what if foreigners race to unload their dollar debt holdings? What could possibly close our trade deficit at that point?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any way out of this except through hyperinflation &#8212; the full-on, Weimar-style variety. It&#8217;s coming. I don&#8217;t know when. But it&#8217;s clearly inevitable. And it will be terrifying in certain geographic regions.</p>
<p>Think of America as tomorrow&#8217;s Zimbabwe, but on a much larger scale. Add to this our ready-to-go concentration camps, our paramilitarized state and local police, and our government&#8217;s new freedom to spy, command and control, and you&#8217;ve got the USSA &#8212; the United Socialist States of Amerikka.</p>
<p>The pisser is that it was all avoidable.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that most Americans don&#8217;t have even a modicum of interest or knowledge in economics or history. They&#8217;re about to learn the hard way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Horrifying Ramifications of Proposed Bailout Bill by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/horrifying-ramifications-of-proposed-bailout-bill.html#comment-1073</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/horrifying-ramifications-of-proposed-bailout-bill.html#comment-1073</guid>
					<description>Oh, and Happy Equinox!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Happy Equinox!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The View From Over There by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/the-view-from-over-there.html#comment-1046</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/the-view-from-over-there.html#comment-1046</guid>
					<description>Oh, right, I forgot, the right-hand column is different on the home page vs. an article-specific page.  

But if you go to the &lt;a href="/blog" rel="nofollow"&gt;home page&lt;/a&gt;, then beneath my photo, you will see:

MY BARACK OBAMA FUNDRAISING PAGE
&lt;a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/outreach/view/main/tomchappell" rel="nofollow"&gt;Donate!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, right, I forgot, the right-hand column is different on the home page vs. an article-specific page.  </p>
<p>But if you go to the <a href="/blog" rel="nofollow">home page</a>, then beneath my photo, you will see:</p>
<p>MY BARACK OBAMA FUNDRAISING PAGE<br />
<a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/outreach/view/main/tomchappell" rel="nofollow">Donate!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The View From Over There by John Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/the-view-from-over-there.html#comment-1045</link>
		<author>John Blackburn</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/the-view-from-over-there.html#comment-1045</guid>
					<description>Where, where is this "Donate!" link in the right-hand-column?  I am intrigued by the exclamation point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where, where is this &#8220;Donate!&#8221; link in the right-hand-column?  I am intrigued by the exclamation point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Better Know a GOP VP Pick by Jeff Lorenzini</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/better-know-a-gop-vp-pick.html#comment-1033</link>
		<author>Jeff Lorenzini</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/better-know-a-gop-vp-pick.html#comment-1033</guid>
					<description>Abstinence only, eh? Turns out, her 17-year old daughter didn't really get that message. See, her 4-month old downs baby couldn't have been by her daughter, since her daughter is 5-months pregnant. What a great excuse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abstinence only, eh? Turns out, her 17-year old daughter didn&#8217;t really get that message. See, her 4-month old downs baby couldn&#8217;t have been by her daughter, since her daughter is 5-months pregnant. What a great excuse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worst. Housing. Ever. by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/worst-housing-ever.html#comment-1030</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/worst-housing-ever.html#comment-1030</guid>
					<description>Amen. The main-stream economic media is chronically bullish, no matter what, but their non-stop and repetitive calls of bottoms in real-estate prices and financial stocks have by now come close to self-parody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen. The main-stream economic media is chronically bullish, no matter what, but their non-stop and repetitive calls of bottoms in real-estate prices and financial stocks have by now come close to self-parody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worst. Housing. Ever. by John Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/worst-housing-ever.html#comment-1029</link>
		<author>John Blackburn</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/09/worst-housing-ever.html#comment-1029</guid>
					<description>For those thinking a bottom in California housing is near, and that buying now is urgent, consider why you think this at all. Many parties are working hard to make you believe this while offering only short-term optimistic data as evidence.  Long-term, forget it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those thinking a bottom in California housing is near, and that buying now is urgent, consider why you think this at all. Many parties are working hard to make you believe this while offering only short-term optimistic data as evidence.  Long-term, forget it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should you buy a home&#8230;now? by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/should-you-buy-a-housenow.html#comment-1017</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/should-you-buy-a-housenow.html#comment-1017</guid>
					<description>September 1, 2008: $406,000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>September 1, 2008: $406,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Calabasas Fire by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/calabasas-fire.html#comment-1024</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/calabasas-fire.html#comment-1024</guid>
					<description>There was another much-more-serious fire a few years ago, which got pretty close, though not as close as this, which would have made everybody think of that, if they hadn't already.

And even before then, I have occasionally had to wait for a desired backup to be retrieved from off-site storage, so I presume that we're in good shape that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was another much-more-serious fire a few years ago, which got pretty close, though not as close as this, which would have made everybody think of that, if they hadn&#8217;t already.</p>
<p>And even before then, I have occasionally had to wait for a desired backup to be retrieved from off-site storage, so I presume that we&#8217;re in good shape that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Calabasas Fire by Leah</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/calabasas-fire.html#comment-1023</link>
		<author>Leah</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/calabasas-fire.html#comment-1023</guid>
					<description>How is your company's disaster recovery plan, including OFFSITE storage and OFFSITE recovery?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is your company&#8217;s disaster recovery plan, including OFFSITE storage and OFFSITE recovery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intentional Community by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/intentional-community.html#comment-1016</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/intentional-community.html#comment-1016</guid>
					<description>...at least we've got a Plan B for retirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;at least we&#8217;ve got a Plan B for retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intentional Community by John Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/intentional-community.html#comment-982</link>
		<author>John Blackburn</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/08/intentional-community.html#comment-982</guid>
					<description>Sounds interesting in theory, but the details must be *really* interesting--and challenging. 400sq for personal space sounds workable if it's private enough to get away from the noise and tumult of the other residents.  28 other residents!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds interesting in theory, but the details must be *really* interesting&#8211;and challenging. 400sq for personal space sounds workable if it&#8217;s private enough to get away from the noise and tumult of the other residents.  28 other residents!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glen Greenwald&#8217;s Response to Obama&#8217;s FISA Cave by Bill Standley</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/07/glen-greenwalds-great-response-to-obamas-fisa-cave.html#comment-948</link>
		<author>Bill Standley</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/07/glen-greenwalds-great-response-to-obamas-fisa-cave.html#comment-948</guid>
					<description>We'll know our police state has advanced to the next level when Glen disappears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll know our police state has advanced to the next level when Glen disappears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Peacock / Squirrel / Cat Frenzy! by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/07/squirrel-frenzy.html#comment-947</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/07/squirrel-frenzy.html#comment-947</guid>
					<description>Well, we would never want to mention a 4th, extra-legal cat, Malley.  Plus, he hides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we would never want to mention a 4th, extra-legal cat, Malley.  Plus, he hides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Peacock / Squirrel / Cat Frenzy! by leah</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/07/squirrel-frenzy.html#comment-945</link>
		<author>leah</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/07/squirrel-frenzy.html#comment-945</guid>
					<description>Looks like a scene from Jumanji ... with wildlife trying to creep inside the house through this window.  I see 6 cat ears.  Are there more than 3 cats living with you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a scene from Jumanji &#8230; with wildlife trying to creep inside the house through this window.  I see 6 cat ears.  Are there more than 3 cats living with you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Peacock / Squirrel / Cat Frenzy! by John Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/07/squirrel-frenzy.html#comment-936</link>
		<author>John Blackburn</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/07/squirrel-frenzy.html#comment-936</guid>
					<description>Readers looking for balanced reporting appreciate your keen editorial judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers looking for balanced reporting appreciate your keen editorial judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hilarious / Terrifying Graph of Lending from Federal Reserve To Banks by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/hilariousterrifying-graph-of-lending-from-federal-reserve-to-banks.html#comment-934</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 05:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/hilariousterrifying-graph-of-lending-from-federal-reserve-to-banks.html#comment-934</guid>
					<description>Click on the &lt;a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/fredgraph?chart_type=line&#038;width=1000&#038;height=600&#038;preserve_ratio=true&#038;s%5B1%5D%5Bid%5D=BORROW" rel="nofollow"&gt;graph&lt;/a&gt; to see the June update.  It's...higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click on the <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/fredgraph?chart_type=line&#038;width=1000&#038;height=600&#038;preserve_ratio=true&#038;s%5B1%5D%5Bid%5D=BORROW" rel="nofollow">graph</a> to see the June update.  It&#8217;s&#8230;higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Axis of Evil, Iranian Chapter by John Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/07/axis-of-evil-iranian-chapter.html#comment-932</link>
		<author>John Blackburn</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 05:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/07/axis-of-evil-iranian-chapter.html#comment-932</guid>
					<description>This could also simply be election-year posturing.  "I care about our national security.  As you know, I even co-sponsored a resolution to block those sons-of—the Iranians from touching any oil at all..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could also simply be election-year posturing.  &#8220;I care about our national security.  As you know, I even co-sponsored a resolution to block those sons-of—the Iranians from touching any oil at all&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;This American Life&#8217; on the Global Credit Crisis by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/05/this-american-life-explains-the-sub-prime-mortgage-blowout.html#comment-931</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/05/this-american-life-explains-the-sub-prime-mortgage-blowout.html#comment-931</guid>
					<description>Stand by for Phase 3 of the Credit Crisis: it wasn't only mortgages, but also credit card debt, that was sliced and diced into tranches of CDO's.

Talk about being under water; credit card debt has zero equity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stand by for Phase 3 of the Credit Crisis: it wasn&#8217;t only mortgages, but also credit card debt, that was sliced and diced into tranches of CDO&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Talk about being under water; credit card debt has zero equity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Housing Price Bust&#8230;Getting There! by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/housing-price-bustgetting-there.html#comment-930</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/housing-price-bustgetting-there.html#comment-930</guid>
					<description>Sounds like a pretty good deal, 50% off and all.  

Of course, it's in bumfuck, California, but that's still only 20 miles from Palm Springs, which is actually fairly classy.  Beverly Hills is further away from Sunland, for example.  

My own instincts are that we've still got further to fall, and property prices will almost certainly overshoot lower than fair value, because that's what pendulum swings do.  That said, it's really, really hard to accurately call a market bottom.  

So I applaud your purchase, especially if you can pay it off immediately, or at least within the next 10 years.  You might have an insane water bill, but at least no rent.  And nice restaurants only 20 miles away.  And coyotes! (They're bitey!)

Wow, more than 50% off, in less than a year, that's...I never dared to predict that large of a drop, though I wondered at the possibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a pretty good deal, 50% off and all.  </p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s in bumfuck, California, but that&#8217;s still only 20 miles from Palm Springs, which is actually fairly classy.  Beverly Hills is further away from Sunland, for example.  </p>
<p>My own instincts are that we&#8217;ve still got further to fall, and property prices will almost certainly overshoot lower than fair value, because that&#8217;s what pendulum swings do.  That said, it&#8217;s really, really hard to accurately call a market bottom.  </p>
<p>So I applaud your purchase, especially if you can pay it off immediately, or at least within the next 10 years.  You might have an insane water bill, but at least no rent.  And nice restaurants only 20 miles away.  And coyotes! (They&#8217;re bitey!)</p>
<p>Wow, more than 50% off, in less than a year, that&#8217;s&#8230;I never dared to predict that large of a drop, though I wondered at the possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Housing Price Bust&#8230;Getting There! by Jeff Lorenzini</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/housing-price-bustgetting-there.html#comment-929</link>
		<author>Jeff Lorenzini</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/housing-price-bustgetting-there.html#comment-929</guid>
					<description>That's interesting you mention the banks have finally given in and lowered their prices. We just put an offer on a house out in Thermal, near Palm Springs, for $124k. On Friday, it was $144k, and by Monday is was $124k. They started at $177k, though. It sold last August for $260k. So, we're getting it for half-price in less than a year. It's a great deal, actually. Only problem is it's in Thermal (118 degrees last week!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting you mention the banks have finally given in and lowered their prices. We just put an offer on a house out in Thermal, near Palm Springs, for $124k. On Friday, it was $144k, and by Monday is was $124k. They started at $177k, though. It sold last August for $260k. So, we&#8217;re getting it for half-price in less than a year. It&#8217;s a great deal, actually. Only problem is it&#8217;s in Thermal (118 degrees last week!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Wherefore, President George W. Bush, by such conduct, is guilty of an impeachable offense, warranting removal from office.&#8221; by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/wherefore-president-george-w-bush-by-such-conduct-is-guilty-of-an-impeachable-offense-warranting-removal-from-office.html#comment-901</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/wherefore-president-george-w-bush-by-such-conduct-is-guilty-of-an-impeachable-offense-warranting-removal-from-office.html#comment-901</guid>
					<description>Okay, that Stormdancer guy? He's a dragon, and everyone posting comments on his blog is a dragon.  And then there's this: "This is a test of the Emergency Dragon System. This is only a test. Had this been an actual dragon, you would have already been devoured."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, that Stormdancer guy? He&#8217;s a dragon, and everyone posting comments on his blog is a dragon.  And then there&#8217;s this: &#8220;This is a test of the Emergency Dragon System. This is only a test. Had this been an actual dragon, you would have already been devoured.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kaboom! (Macro) by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/kaboom-macro.html#comment-896</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/kaboom-macro.html#comment-896</guid>
					<description>Well, looks like there was no big sell-off this morning.  I did end up selling a fraction of my own holdings, since I clearly was too heavily invested for my own peace of mind, what with feeling compelled to write huge blog posts and all.

[Suddenly whipsawing back to greed]: Hey, big Apple keynote today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, looks like there was no big sell-off this morning.  I did end up selling a fraction of my own holdings, since I clearly was too heavily invested for my own peace of mind, what with feeling compelled to write huge blog posts and all.</p>
<p>[Suddenly whipsawing back to greed]: Hey, big Apple keynote today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kaboom! (Macro) by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/kaboom-macro.html#comment-888</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/kaboom-macro.html#comment-888</guid>
					<description>I was asking that question in the context of a tax-sheltered investment account, where one doesn't take a tax hit for selling equities and moving to cash. 

In a tax-exposed account where you've had a big run-up, the calculations are different, because selling, and sitting on the sidelines while the carnage clears, has not only the opportunity cost of missing out on any run-up, but also comes with a  large tax bill, and substantially reduces your investment capital going forward (though not nearly as much as some of the most spectacular market collapses).

But a tax-sheltered, low-fee account exerts virtually no friction on your ability to exit and wait out a blood bath.  The question of when and in what manner to get back in is a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was asking that question in the context of a tax-sheltered investment account, where one doesn&#8217;t take a tax hit for selling equities and moving to cash. </p>
<p>In a tax-exposed account where you&#8217;ve had a big run-up, the calculations are different, because selling, and sitting on the sidelines while the carnage clears, has not only the opportunity cost of missing out on any run-up, but also comes with a  large tax bill, and substantially reduces your investment capital going forward (though not nearly as much as some of the most spectacular market collapses).</p>
<p>But a tax-sheltered, low-fee account exerts virtually no friction on your ability to exit and wait out a blood bath.  The question of when and in what manner to get back in is a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kaboom! (Macro) by John Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/kaboom-macro.html#comment-887</link>
		<author>John Blackburn</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/06/kaboom-macro.html#comment-887</guid>
					<description>Asking "what's the potential upside [of US equities]" is meaningless without a comparative frame of reference.  Over what period of time, and compared to &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt;?  Will US corporations with a strong international presence fare well relative to other investments over the next 20 years?  Very probably yes.  Over the next year?  Who knows?

And don't underestimate the many factors that contribute to the perceived value and stability of US stocks and markets relative to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asking &#8220;what&#8217;s the potential upside [of US equities]&#8221; is meaningless without a comparative frame of reference.  Over what period of time, and compared to <i>what</i>?  Will US corporations with a strong international presence fare well relative to other investments over the next 20 years?  Very probably yes.  Over the next year?  Who knows?</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t underestimate the many factors that contribute to the perceived value and stability of US stocks and markets relative to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XKCD by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2007/04/xkcd.html#comment-829</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2007/04/xkcd.html#comment-829</guid>
					<description>There's an article about XKCD in the &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/26/business/media/26link.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, which has an interesting fact about the Dream Girl comic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an article about XKCD in the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/26/business/media/26link.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>, which has an interesting fact about the Dream Girl comic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Crucible by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/05/the-crucible.html#comment-803</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 06:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/05/the-crucible.html#comment-803</guid>
					<description>It's five hours later, and the air conditioner has still been on without let-up.

It's functioning perfectly -- the house was tolerable after an hour or so -- but it was just so hot (Fri: 96, Sat: 98, Sun: 97) -- that the walls would rebake the air, if left to their own devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s five hours later, and the air conditioner has still been on without let-up.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s functioning perfectly &#8212; the house was tolerable after an hour or so &#8212; but it was just so hot (Fri: 96, Sat: 98, Sun: 97) &#8212; that the walls would rebake the air, if left to their own devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Housing Price Bust Still Has a Long Way To Go by John Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/05/the-economist-housing-price-bust-still-has-long-way-to-go.html#comment-795</link>
		<author>John Blackburn</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 17:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/05/the-economist-housing-price-bust-still-has-long-way-to-go.html#comment-795</guid>
					<description>Sounds reasonable to me, too.  If those numbers hold true, homeowners who sold in Los Angeles or another of the hotspots and then bought somewhere else outside the hotspots preserved 20% of their sale gains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds reasonable to me, too.  If those numbers hold true, homeowners who sold in Los Angeles or another of the hotspots and then bought somewhere else outside the hotspots preserved 20% of their sale gains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solvang Century 2008 by Alicia</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-762</link>
		<author>Alicia</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-762</guid>
					<description>Yay Tom !  I was told this was an interesting read, and it really was -- u go guy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay Tom !  I was told this was an interesting read, and it really was &#8212; u go guy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solvang Century 2008 by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-759</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-759</guid>
					<description>I tried to run up some stairs today, and my knees politely declined, even though it's been six days.  I clearly was slightly too hard on them at Solvang, and perhaps on the week-before training ride.  Right there in those last few weeks, we were increasing the amount that we were riding each week by more than the 5-10% that you're supposed to limit it to.  

Hopefully it was the kind of too-hard damage that responds well to rest (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tendinitis" rel="nofollow"&gt;tendonitis&lt;/a&gt;), and not the kind of too-hard damage that screws up your knees for the rest of your life (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chondromalacia_patellae" rel="nofollow"&gt;chondromalacia patellae&lt;/a&gt;).  

I really expect that it'll turn out to be the former, "good" kind of knee damage, but we'll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to run up some stairs today, and my knees politely declined, even though it&#8217;s been six days.  I clearly was slightly too hard on them at Solvang, and perhaps on the week-before training ride.  Right there in those last few weeks, we were increasing the amount that we were riding each week by more than the 5-10% that you&#8217;re supposed to limit it to.  </p>
<p>Hopefully it was the kind of too-hard damage that responds well to rest (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tendinitis" rel="nofollow">tendonitis</a>), and not the kind of too-hard damage that screws up your knees for the rest of your life (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chondromalacia_patellae" rel="nofollow">chondromalacia patellae</a>).  </p>
<p>I really expect that it&#8217;ll turn out to be the former, &#8220;good&#8221; kind of knee damage, but we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solvang Century 2008 by Dana Myers</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-752</link>
		<author>Dana Myers</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-752</guid>
					<description>I'll be doing the "Moderate Metric" course at CtC, I have a couple of friends in L.A. that this will be their first metric, so I figure it'll be a nice ride roughly comparable to one of my typical Sunday rides (usually 65 miles/4000ft).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be doing the &#8220;Moderate Metric&#8221; course at CtC, I have a couple of friends in L.A. that this will be their first metric, so I figure it&#8217;ll be a nice ride roughly comparable to one of my typical Sunday rides (usually 65 miles/4000ft).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solvang Century 2008 by Tom Chappell</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-750</link>
		<author>Tom Chappell</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-750</guid>
					<description>@Dana: I &lt;em&gt;am&lt;/em&gt; thinking of riding the century option at &lt;a href="http://www.cvcbike.org/cruisin/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Cruising the Conejo&lt;/a&gt; -- it's attractive because I haven't done it before, and I wouldn't have to go to hotels, etc.  I was interested in doing a double metric century, and thought that they offered that option, but I guess not.  But the century on CtC still has quite a bit more climbing than Solvang, so that would be a nice incrementally-harder challenge.  At 6,000 feet of climbing, it would be 1,000 feet more even than the &lt;a href="/blog/2007/09/next-bike-ride-100-kilometers-to-mt-wilson-observatory.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mt. Wilson summit metric century&lt;/a&gt; that Ron and did in September.

@Chris: Yes, older people make good trouncing targets.  It's just a bit troubling when the actual trouncing happens so rarely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dana: I <em>am</em> thinking of riding the century option at <a href="http://www.cvcbike.org/cruisin/" rel="nofollow">Cruising the Conejo</a> &#8212; it&#8217;s attractive because I haven&#8217;t done it before, and I wouldn&#8217;t have to go to hotels, etc.  I was interested in doing a double metric century, and thought that they offered that option, but I guess not.  But the century on CtC still has quite a bit more climbing than Solvang, so that would be a nice incrementally-harder challenge.  At 6,000 feet of climbing, it would be 1,000 feet more even than the <a href="/blog/2007/09/next-bike-ride-100-kilometers-to-mt-wilson-observatory.html" rel="nofollow">Mt. Wilson summit metric century</a> that Ron and did in September.</p>
<p>@Chris: Yes, older people make good trouncing targets.  It&#8217;s just a bit troubling when the actual trouncing happens so rarely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solvang Century 2008 by Chris Ravenscroft</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-749</link>
		<author>Chris Ravenscroft</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-749</guid>
					<description>So, here I am, back home from Austin, where my main physical activity was chugging down mexican beer.
I read your story with great interest, living the healthy life vicariously.
Well done, finally beating the old guy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, here I am, back home from Austin, where my main physical activity was chugging down mexican beer.<br />
I read your story with great interest, living the healthy life vicariously.<br />
Well done, finally beating the old guy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Half-Time Show: Forty-Two! by Dana Myers</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/01/half-time-show-forty-two.html#comment-748</link>
		<author>Dana Myers</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/01/half-time-show-forty-two.html#comment-748</guid>
					<description>Say hello to Larry Helmerich for me; it's been a while.  BTW, I dropped from 245+ to 175-ish last year myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say hello to Larry Helmerich for me; it&#8217;s been a while.  BTW, I dropped from 245+ to 175-ish last year myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solvang Century 2008 by Dana Myers</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-747</link>
		<author>Dana Myers</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2008/03/solvang-century-2008.html#comment-747</guid>
					<description>We left almost exactly an hour later, so we didn't have to ride through as much fog - we rode out of it after 10-15 miles, but I'm sure it was quite a bit chillier an hour earlier.  Performance Bike sells "Thermax Dot" gloves - get a couple of pairs, they're light and warm enough to cope with some fog.  My calculations based on depature time and average speed indicate I passed you shortly after the Santa Maria SAG stop, or perhaps left the SAG stop before you did - do you remember seeing me, #1955? :-)  Great ride, in any case.  Are you planning to do the Cruisin' the Conejo ride?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We left almost exactly an hour later, so we didn&#8217;t have to ride through as much fog - we rode out of it after 10-15 miles, but I&#8217;m sure it was quite a bit chillier an hour earlier.  Performance Bike sells &#8220;Thermax Dot&#8221; gloves - get a couple of pairs, they&#8217;re light and warm enough to cope with some fog.  My calculations based on depature time and average speed indicate I passed you shortly after the Santa Maria SAG stop, or perhaps left the SAG stop before you did - do you remember seeing me, #1955? <img src='http://tomchappell.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Great ride, in any case.  Are you planning to do the Cruisin&#8217; the Conejo ride?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So, How Did Tom Chappell and Ron Traver Do At Solvang 2002? by Dana Myers</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2002/03/so-how-did-tom-chappell-and-ron-traver-do-at-solvang-2002.html#comment-745</link>
		<author>Dana Myers</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2002/03/so-how-did-tom-chappell-and-ron-traver-do-at-solvang-2002.html#comment-745</guid>
					<description>I was just looking for mentions of the Foxen Canyon Wall, and found this.  I just did the Solvang Century this weekend (5h 57m in the saddle, 7h 10m wall-time), and my Garmin Edge 305 log totally concurs with your measurement of The Wall; 240 ft in about .6 miles.  That's really not such a big deal; there's a longer, steeper climb on Mount Diablo, for example.  Still, doing the Foxen Canyon Wall after riding 90 miles takes some effort ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just looking for mentions of the Foxen Canyon Wall, and found this.  I just did the Solvang Century this weekend (5h 57m in the saddle, 7h 10m wall-time), and my Garmin Edge 305 log totally concurs with your measurement of The Wall; 240 ft in about .6 miles.  That&#8217;s really not such a big deal; there&#8217;s a longer, steeper climb on Mount Diablo, for example.  Still, doing the Foxen Canyon Wall after riding 90 miles takes some effort <img src='http://tomchappell.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
