<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dark Side of &#8216;No New Taxes&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomchappell.com/blog/2007/08/the-dark-side-of-no-new-taxes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2007/08/the-dark-side-of-no-new-taxes.html</link>
	<description>Yet Another Media Spotlight</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 04:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Standley</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2007/08/the-dark-side-of-no-new-taxes.html#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Standley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomchappell.com/blog/2007/08/the-dark-side-of-no-new-taxes.html#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Bridges are a form of capital. Read why capital is an asset in the private sector and a liability in the public sector.
http://www.mises.org/story/2670

Then it all makes sense.

Austrian economics to the rescue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bridges are a form of capital. Read why capital is an asset in the private sector and a liability in the public sector.<br />
<a href="http://www.mises.org/story/2670" rel="nofollow">http://www.mises.org/story/2670</a></p>
<p>Then it all makes sense.</p>
<p>Austrian economics to the rescue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Lorenzini</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2007/08/the-dark-side-of-no-new-taxes.html#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lorenzini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomchappell.com/blog/2007/08/the-dark-side-of-no-new-taxes.html#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Bridges are expensive. I was reading the Measure M allocations, and widening freeways was at $20 million, but if a bridge was involved, all of a sudden the cost was $200 million. It's crazy to think of the trillion ways we could have used the trillion dollars the bush administration stole from us for this cluster fuck that is Iraq. It's just so sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bridges are expensive. I was reading the Measure M allocations, and widening freeways was at $20 million, but if a bridge was involved, all of a sudden the cost was $200 million. It&#8217;s crazy to think of the trillion ways we could have used the trillion dollars the bush administration stole from us for this cluster fuck that is Iraq. It&#8217;s just so sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Helmerich</title>
		<link>http://tomchappell.com/blog/2007/08/the-dark-side-of-no-new-taxes.html#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Helmerich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 06:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomchappell.com/blog/2007/08/the-dark-side-of-no-new-taxes.html#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Apparently 80,000 bridges in the US are rated as "Structurally Deficient".  The bridge in Minneapolis was rated a 4 on a scale of 1 to 9.  When Los Angeles started rating restaurants on a scale of A to D, I stopped eating at restaurants rated less than a B.  I wonder if people would start voting for funds to improve infrastructure if every bridge had its 1 to 9 rating posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently 80,000 bridges in the US are rated as &#8220;Structurally Deficient&#8221;.  The bridge in Minneapolis was rated a 4 on a scale of 1 to 9.  When Los Angeles started rating restaurants on a scale of A to D, I stopped eating at restaurants rated less than a B.  I wonder if people would start voting for funds to improve infrastructure if every bridge had its 1 to 9 rating posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

