Comments on: Whoa! Wait, the 21st Century? http://tomchappell.com/blog/2006/10/whoa-wait-the-21st-century.html Yet Another Media Spotlight Sat, 19 May 2012 04:38:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Jeff Lorenzini http://tomchappell.com/blog/2006/10/whoa-wait-the-21st-century.html#comment-20 Jeff Lorenzini Wed, 01 Nov 2006 19:15:22 +0000 http://tomchappell.com/blog/?p=18#comment-20 Well, there goes the neighborhood! Well, there goes the neighborhood!

]]> By: Tom Chappell http://tomchappell.com/blog/2006/10/whoa-wait-the-21st-century.html#comment-19 Tom Chappell Sat, 28 Oct 2006 02:24:03 +0000 http://tomchappell.com/blog/?p=18#comment-19 Well, it's quite a bit different when the decree is that the State must no longer be taking rights away from some group. The Church is still allowed to restrict the Sacrament of Marriage however they like. Well, it’s quite a bit different when the decree is that the State must no longer be taking rights away from some group. The Church is still allowed to restrict the Sacrament of Marriage however they like.

]]> By: Bill Standley http://tomchappell.com/blog/2006/10/whoa-wait-the-21st-century.html#comment-18 Bill Standley Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:48:46 +0000 http://tomchappell.com/blog/?p=18#comment-18 Law by decree is repugnant on its face. Even a 15th century monarch would not have the audacity to invent new law by fiat. (Well, he might have the audacity, but he wouldn’t really do it. Such acts have consequences, y’know…) I'm afraid that <a href="http://www.vdare.com/buchanan/061026_tyranny.htm" rel="nofollow">Pat’s right</a> on this one. Law by decree is repugnant on its face. Even a 15th century monarch would not have the audacity to invent new law by fiat. (Well, he might have the audacity, but he wouldn’t really do it. Such acts have consequences, y’know…)

I’m afraid that Pat’s right on this one.

]]>